Digital Citizenship has become my passion over the past few years. Watching the world’s obsession with digital devices and constant connectivity has been fascinating as it coincided with the toppling of the information hierarchy. I still use the word library even though library schools are now called schools of information science. When I visited with some University of Washington iSchool students a few years ago, a young male student asked about my background. I told him I was a librarian and he smiled and said, “How quaint!” I smiled back thinking there is just something about the word library I don’t want to give up.

Of course, I know we carry our libraries in our pockets now! We are globally networked prosumers– both consuming and producing content on digital apps through virtual communities. This change was revolutionary and I am thankful to have witnessed it as a librarian at the turn of the century. I often remember a moment when I stood in my school library and felt the change that was happening. Early one morning, before the students and teachers arrived, I stood looking at the library shelves and tables thinking, “What will become of all this?” It felt as if the floor was shaking because I knew the library was rapidly about to change…. and it did. The library became a “digital hub” and a makerspace filled with laptops and devices, interactive whiteboards and Skype sessions with authors.

These changes brought my passion for digital citizenship to the forefront and, as a writing trainer with a love for literature, emphasized the need to explore how literacy was changing. When I found Mackey and Jacobson’s (2011) term metaliteracy, I instantly knew it was important. Recently, I wrote a guest blog post on the Metaliteracy.org site.

My interest in digital citizenship and changing literacy has intersected with our current philosophical era, in part due to that revolutionary moment I felt in my school library. I sensed that nothing would ever be the same. Yet, I still have such love for the core values of librarianship. I felt this oscillation between a respect for tradition and acceptance of revolutionary changes for the past decade.

A new term, which I discovered while investigating postmodernism, hit me like a bolt of lightning. Just when I began to understand postmodernism, I learned that it is over! We are living in a new era which has yet to be named. One of the terms for our current philosophical moment is metamodernism (Vermeulen and van Den Akker, 2010).

Collaborating with these scholars illustrates metaliteracy in the sense of networking across distance to access, produce and share information. The foundation for my book, Metamodernism and Changing Literacy, is the merge of two theoretical frameworks: the philosophical framework of metamodernism and the information science framework of metaliteracy.

What’s in a name? “A rose by any other name would smell as sweet.” Was Shakespeare right? Perhaps it doesn’t matter what you call it because we all sense that our lives have changed along with the information revolution. Yet, agreeing on common terms helps us better understand and communicate our ideas. Giving credit to our sources still matters and realizing that we must be responsible for digital citizenship has become critical. I have great appreciation for colleagues (Mackey and Jacobson, Vermeulen and van Den Akker) for offering new nomenclature that advocates digital citizenship for us all.

Mackey, T., & Jacobson, T. (2011). “Reframing information literacy as a metaliteracy”, C&RL News 72: 62-78.

Hill, V. J. Metamodernism and Changing Literacy: Emerging Research and Opportunities. (2020) Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 1-283.

Vermeulen, T. & Van den Akker, R. (2010). Notes on metamodernism. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 2, 1-14.